BIMCO data shows the crude tanker order book has climbed to 14.1% of the existing fleet, a nine-year high and a dramatic reversal from the 2.8% floor of March 2023. Most of the new capacity is replacement, not growth, which leaves spot markets tight through 2026 and 2027 while reshaping scrap, finance and chartering decisions well into 2028.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Crude tanker owners have quietly spent 2024 and 2025 fixing one of the shipping world's most under-ordered segments, and the numbers are now impossible to ignore. According to BIMCO's latest shipping number of the week, the crude tanker order book has climbed to 14.1% of the existing fleet, the highest ratio since 2016. That is a more than five-fold jump from the 2.8% floor set in March 2023, when contracting had collapsed on the back of soft rates and uncertainty over future fuel rules.
The context matters more than the headline number. BIMCO's own forecasts put crude tanker fleet supply growth at just 0.5% in 2025 and 1.5% in 2026, because the bulk of the incoming ships are slated to replace older tonnage rather than expand it. The age profile of the crude fleet is unusually stretched: a significant share of VLCCs and Suezmaxes are already past fifteen years, and an even larger cohort sits in the sanctions-adjacent grey and dark fleet that mainstream charterers will not touch. BIMCO and several independent tanker desks expect scrapping to accelerate through 2027 as new yard slots deliver.
That timing is exactly why the current order surge is not translating into near-term pressure on rates. Lloyd's List reported VLCC indices punching above $420,000 per day on peak Middle East fixtures earlier this year, and the Baltic Exchange's Suezmax and Aframax benchmarks have held firm into April. Owners contracting today are looking at delivery slots in 2027 and 2028, which means 2026 rates are still governed by the current, tight fleet and its exposure to Hormuz-region risk premia, OPEC+ volume unwinds, and Indian buyers' rotation into Middle East barrels.
The other story buried in the BIMCO numbers is where the capacity is going. Korean yards — HD Korea Shipbuilding and Samsung Heavy Industries in particular — have absorbed a disproportionate share of the dual-fuel and LNG-ready crude tanker order book, while Chinese yards have taken the bulk of conventional VLCC and Suezmax work. Pricing is firming in both markets, and long-lead items like MAN main engines and scrubber packages are running into 2027 delivery queues. Owners who missed the 2024 contracting window are now facing both higher newbuild prices and later slots.
Seatrade and Argus coverage of the same data set highlights a concern that does not usually surface in a rising order book: elderly vessel concentration. If scrapping fails to keep pace with deliveries, the nominal fleet grows but the marketable fleet — the ships mainstream charterers, majors and refiners actually accept — grows faster, pressuring rates in 2028 and beyond. That is the scenario BIMCO's 0.5%/1.5% growth figures implicitly rely on being wrong in the right direction.
What this means for operators: charterers should not read the nine-year-high headline as a reason to delay period cover. The near-term crude tanker market is still structurally tight, and 2026 and most of 2027 will be governed by the existing fleet's age and risk profile, not by ships that are still plate steel in a Korean dry dock. Owners should price the 2028 risk honestly into any newbuild commitment taken in the next two quarters. Lenders and equity investors looking at tanker exposure should watch scrap rates and FSU absorption as the leading indicators — those are what will decide whether 14.1% becomes a healthy renewal story or the first chapter of a 2028 oversupply.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚠️ Intelligence Disclaimer: This analysis is produced by Eagle Intelligence's AI-assisted automated analysis system and is provided for informational purposes only. See our editorial standards. It is not a substitute for official maritime safety advisories from UKMTO, MSCHOA, IMO, or flag state authorities. Operational decisions should always be based on official guidance and professional judgment. Eagle Intelligence accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content.
Live chokepoint status, war-risk shifts, and the daily maritime wire, straight to your inbox. Free.
Leave a comment
All comments moderated for quality