BREAKINGChina-linked hackers step up attacks on European shipping
← Eagle Intelligence News
War RiskHIGH ALERT

Operation Earnest Will 2.0: Why 1987 Playbook Won't Work in 2026 Hormuz Crisis

Eagle Intelligence AI·Eagle Intelligence·March 22, 2026 · 06:03 UTC·3 min read
Why This Matters

US deploys 2,500 Marines to Gulf, echoing 1987 tanker escort missions. But Iran's drone arsenal and half-sized Navy make a repeat impossible.

Operation Earnest Will 2.0: Why 1987 Playbook Won't Work in 2026 Hormuz Crisis

Advertisement

In 1987, the United States launched Operation Earnest Will to protect Kuwaiti tankers from Iranian attacks during the Tanker War. Four decades later, the Trump administration is considering a similar response to threats against commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. But the operational environment has fundamentally changed.

The parallels are striking. Then, Iran attacked tankers to destabilize oil markets and pressure Iraq. Today, Iran is using drone strikes and projectile attacks to disrupt global energy supplies following the US-Israeli military campaign. Both scenarios involve protecting merchant vessels in narrow waters against a technologically asymmetric adversary.

But the differences are stark. In 1987, Operation Earnest Will could deploy 60 ships and coordinate escorts with Belgian, French, Italian, Dutch, and British naval forces. Today, the US Navy's fleet is roughly half that size, and Europe has been reluctant to commit hardware. Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK pledged to "contribute to appropriate efforts" on March 20, but without specifying minesweeping operations or escort assets. The commitment is rhetorical, not operational.

Worse, Iran's offensive capability has evolved dramatically. Drone technology that barely existed in 1987 is now central to Iranian strategy. The IRGC has demonstrated consistent ability to target moving vessels in the strait. Meanwhile, the US faces the strategic problem of policing 35 miles of water against an adversary willing to absorb losses. In 1987, attrition worked in America's favor. Today, a single mine or drone strike can trigger cascading insurance withdrawals, port closures, and weeks-long shipping disruptions.

The insurance market has already shifted. P&I clubs are scrutinizing Gulf transits, war-risk premiums have spiked, and dozens of vessels are anchored outside the strait waiting for clarity. No amount of military escorts can restore confidence if insurers won't cover the risk.

Historically, Operation Earnest Will succeeded because it provided visible deterrence and cleared specific shipping corridors. But modern tanker markets are global networks. A single lane protected by US destroyers doesn't fix the problem if refiners can source oil from other routes or alternative suppliers. The 400 million barrels removed from markets by the Strait closure has already forced a 50% oil price spike. Economic pressure, not naval presence, will determine whether tankers return.

The real lesson from 1987: military escorts alone don't end tanker wars. They buy time for diplomacy. Without a ceasefire or negotiated agreement, Operation Earnest Will 2.0 becomes an indefinite naval presence that drains resources while failing to resolve the underlying conflict. The Trump administration's ambiguous commitment to "wind down" military operations while simultaneously deploying more Marines suggests this is already understood. Expect the escort mission to shift from direct protection to minesweeping and shallow-water monitoring, with the bulk of risk management handled by private security contractors and insurance markets.

Advertisement

Related Eagle hubs

⚠️ Intelligence Disclaimer: This analysis is produced by Eagle Intelligence's AI-assisted automated analysis system and is provided for informational purposes only. See our editorial standards. It is not a substitute for official maritime safety advisories from UKMTO, MSCHOA, IMO, or flag state authorities. Operational decisions should always be based on official guidance and professional judgment. Eagle Intelligence accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content.

Get Eagle maritime risk alerts by email

Live chokepoint status, war-risk shifts, and the daily maritime wire, straight to your inbox. Free.

📰 Related Analysis

War Risk

Hormuz Tanker Attacks Intensify Oil Shortage Signals as Diesel Hits Records

Mounting strikes on commercial tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, set against wars cutting exports from Russia, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, are driving tanker rates higher and diesel to record levels, raising immediate questions over energy-flow reliability and crew exposure.

Sep 22, 2026
War Risk

The End of Free Navigation: Hormuz Shifts From Blockade to Controlled Corridor

Hormuz is reopening—but only for selected vessels. Geopolitical screening, AIS manipulation, and political alignment now determine passage, marking a departure from neutral commerce.

Apr 5, 2026
War Risk

Week in One Page: Hormuz Attacks Disrupt Oil Flows While US Claims Record Volumes

Strait of Hormuz attacks and Iranian assertions of control dominated the week, raising direct risks to tanker routing and crew safety even as CENTCOM reported six-month-high oil shipments. The central question is whether sustained traffic volumes can continue under repeated strikes and cyber incidents without forcing wider rerouting or higher war-risk premiums.

Sep 20, 2026
War Risk

Hormuz War-Risk Sharpens After Direct Strikes on U.S.-Contracted Vessel

The Strait of Hormuz risk picture shifted most sharply this week after Iranian drone and missile attacks struck a U.S.-contracted vessel carrying American personnel, producing casualties and prompting U.S. defensive action against Iranian boats; the development raises immediate questions over transit continuity, war-risk pricing and crew willingness in a waterway that remains physically open.

Sep 17, 2026

Comments & Corrections

0Spot an error? Flag it below ↓

Leave a comment

All comments moderated for quality

Be the first to comment on this story
Corrections policy: Flag inaccuracies using the ⚠️ Correction type. Eagle Intelligence will review flagged corrections. Verified corrections result in an article update with a notice appended. Comments are stored locally in your browser and are not shared with other readers.